SKU: 50413735290

Charles Wuorinen - Time's Encomium (For Synthesized & Processed Synthesized Sound) (LP, Album)

Sale price$12.59 Regular price$13.99
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $3.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 16 - Jul 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Charles Wuorinen - Time's Encomium (For Synthesized & Processed Synthesized Sound) (LP, Album)Media Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+) Sleeve Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+) Comments: OG inner sleeve Price tag General notes about this release (please note: our version may differ a little. see the comments above): Time's Encomium was composed and realized between January 1968 and January 1969, at the Columbia Princeton Electronic Music Center in New York. a Nonesuch Records commission This data (when provided) is identical to other releases and

Media Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+)
Sleeve Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+)

Comments:
OG inner sleeve // Price tag

General notes about this release (please note: our version may differ a little. see the comments above):
Time's Encomium was composed and realized between January 1968 and January 1969, at the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center in New York. a Nonesuch Records commission This data (when provided) is identical to other releases and confirmed as valid. The composition won a Pulitzer prize but this is not in evidence in releases produced prior to this award. DETAIL OF THIS RELEASE On THIS release the Matrix/Run-out data is faint and difficult to photograph, but sufficiently legible to interpret as stated: "ARC" is the pressing facility: Allentown Record Co. Inc. The "Pete Helffrich" signature seems illegible but his identity is known and associated with ARC in numerous other examples. The "7-26-69" follows closely but only the first digit is debatable. This is the date of production. Whole some releases have distinctly-different label designs, others are identical or nearly-so. For the latter. subtle differences with the placement of print on the labels were also examined closely. Variations may be seem with the precise location of print on either side of the spindle in relation to the inner circle of the vinyl. At this time the variations observed may be attributed to the placement of identical labels in slightly different positions. In THIS release: Side A, left side, the "S" of "STEREO" and the "H" of the catalog number begin just inside the circle, and on the right side, the "EO" and ":53" cross the line. Side B, left side, the "S" of "STEREO" and the "H" of the catalog number fall on the line itself, and on the right side, the "E" also falls on the line, and the ":" just inside it. COMPARISONS WITH OTHER RELEASES: THIS release may be identical to [r5229679 Label print placement is one small variant, but the primary reason to a new submission is in the matrix run-out data, which is probably the same (but misread). It states: Side A: H 71225 A Pete Helffrig ARC725-4 Side B: H 71225 B Pete Helffrig ARC725-9 Compared with "ARC 7-26-69" as seem for both sides of THIS release, the missing dashes and "6" of "69" are a concern, but misreading "6" as "5" and "9" as "4" could easily be done. Or might two lacquers have been cut on consecutive days, the 25th and 26th of July, 1969? These are likely to be the identical release, but until the other contributor can verify this proposed correction, it seems inappropriate to overwrite my data on theirs. Therefore THIS one is submitted separately for comparison. COMPARISON WITH OTHER RELEASES Side A of [r216339 shifts the placement of the words one character left. This could be a variance in production, not design. But this release credits Bob Ludwig as the mastering engineer -- clearly contradicted by the data of THIS release. [a271098 [r9578476 has a completely new set of production credits: "Lacquer Cut At – Masterdisk" "Lacquer Cut At – Sterling Sound" "Pressed By – Specialty Records Corporation" [r5681619 is identified as a 1970 repressing with Side B remastered by Bob Ludwig: "Matrix / Runout (Side A Runout): H 71225 A Pete Helffrich" "Matrix / Runout (Side B Runout): H-7̶1̶2̶5̶5̶-B RE-1 71225 B STERLING RL" [r9237218 also admits to a 1970 origin (but not as a repressing), and provides yet another variation on the matrix/runout data: "(Runout etching side A): H 71225 A 2590 002 A-1 Pete Helffrig" "(Runout etching side B): 2590 002 B-1 H 71225 B Pete Helffrig" [r5230703 is identified as a repressing and belongs to a different family of label designs. [r5319760 is identified as a Canadian reissue by WEA Music Of Canada, Ltd. [r3768523 is designated as a UK release, and lacks label images, production credits, and deadwax data.

 

. Time's Encomium

 

Barcode and Other Identifiers:

Matrix / Runout H 71225 A Pete Helffrig ARC725-4
Matrix / Runout H 71225 B Pete Helffrig ARC725-9
Matrix / Runout H 71125 A ... Pete Helffrich ... ARC 7-26-69
Matrix / Runout H 71125 B ... Pete Helffrich ... ARC 7-26-69

 

Recorded At Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center
Pressed By Allentown Record Co. Inc.

Data provided by Discogs
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 50413735290

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 30 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
M
Verified Purchase
Melodie G Cross
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
So far so good
It seems to be working well, so far. The check engine light turned off and the my vehicle seems to be running well. Be sure to follow the instructions. A while back, I wasted some money on a different catalytic converter cleaner because I put the cleaner in on a full tank of gas. It's best to wait until you're at a half tank or less of gasoline before you put in your catalytic converter cleaner. Also, I drove around right after I put in the catalytic converter cleaner and before I filled up my tank again. A couple of days later, I went to the gas station and topped off my tank. Again, it seems to be running well for now.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
ckanchola
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 4
Works ok for some stuff.
I tried this mainly to clean my cats. It sadly didn't work for that at all. It did however work great as a basic fuel system cleaner. It smoothed out my idle and cleaned my O2 sensors they were a bit lazy before using this product now they switch fast like they are supposed too. In terms of my recommendation I say use as a fuel system cleaner. Or if your cats aren't too clogged in my case I bought an old neglected used car that likely had that problem for years. So I don't think any pour in tank cleaner would work in my case. However if your car just started having cat issues. This might work?? I think it's worth a try at least and isn't much more expensive than a basic fuel system cleaner so why not?
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mary C. Lucking
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
PASSED MY INSPECTION! THIS PRODUCT WORKS LIKE A MIRACLE DONT HESITATE TO BUY IT!
Inspection on my car due the end of January! My check engine light was coming on so I checked with a code reader & found it was a P0420. Read about the Catalytic Converter System possibly being in need of replacement or perhaps clogged. I am a woman, and know next to ZERO about cars, but I can read. Did investigate and found that the replacement of a Catalytic Converter system is mad expensive- also found this Moly Cleaner to add to gas tank. I'm not going to lie; I was nervous as I have a Kia Rio 2014 that has a very small gas tank and gets great gas mileage. In reading the consensus seemed to be to add to 1/4 tank of gas and drive fast for good periods of time to blow out the clog (if it was a clog). Did I mention I live in NYC and driving for long periods of time at high speeds can be a problem because of terrible traffic. Anyhow, this Saturday I poured the can into my 1/2 filled tank and hit a parkway near my home early morning. I did drive for 45 miles sometimes at 80mph then 60mph but tried to do it for a good few minutes at a time without getting pulled over. Checked my reader again, and it was not quite ready but the engine light did stay off. Next day, drove to work, stuck in traffic somewhat & never made it over 20mph & checked my reader again- all good to go for inspection. Went last night- my car PASSED and got that sticker in my window- so I am good for another year. The BEST money I have spent all year. Thank you for carrying this product! Saved me thousands! DONT HESITATE TO USE THIS. The hardest part for me was removing the cap on the can!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
CLEVEinCR
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Great stuff
Seemed to work as well as or better than some more expensive catalytic converter cleaners. I put it in while at 1/3 tank and my Check Engine light went out almost immediately once I started driving. My Tundra has almost 230,000 miles and still runs great but was getting a little harder to start after I switched from full synthetic oil to conventional. I’ll never do that again and immediately switched back but the damage was done. Check engine light came on and I had to crank longer to get it started. Adding this Liquid Moly fixed both issues temporarily. I have to wonder if this was used regularly, say every 3 months, if it would clean the catalytic converter more permanently?
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 29, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jon.
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 3
Ehh??
Didn't work for my on my 17 hyundai accent with 90k on it. I poured the whole bottle in with a half tank of gas. And went for a 3 day italian tune up.... no dice.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026

recommand products