Pay in installments of $14.97 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Cuban-Link Choker „Martha“Produktdetails Material: Edelstahl mit 18 Karat Gold PVD Beschichtung (2,5 Mikron) Lnge: Verstellbar von 41 cm bis 46 cm Kettenbreite: 6 mm Gre der Zirkonia Steine: 9 x 13 mm (grn) & klar Hautfreundlich & Wasserbestndig Eleganter Blickfang: Die "Martha" Cuban Halskette Die "Martha" Cuban Kette vereint auf einzigartige Weise lssigen Chic mit romantischem Flair. Sie ist ein echtes Highlight fr dein Layering und lsst sich auch solo perfekt tragen. Edler
Produktdetails
- Material: Edelstahl mit 18 Karat Gold-PVD-Beschichtung (2,5 Mikron)
- Länge: Verstellbar von 41 cm bis 46 cm
- Kettenbreite: 6 mm
- Größe der Zirkonia Steine: 9 x 13 mm (grün) & klar
- Hautfreundlich & Wasserbeständig
Eleganter Blickfang: Die "Martha" Cuban Halskette
Die "Martha" Cuban Kette vereint auf einzigartige Weise lässigen Chic mit romantischem Flair. Sie ist ein echtes Highlight für dein Layering und lässt sich auch solo perfekt tragen.
Edler Glanz und funkelnde Steine:
Die massive Cuban Kette aus robustem Edelstahl mit hochwertiger 18 Karat Vergoldung (2,5 Mikron) strahlt in warmem Gold und sorgt für einen eleganten Blickfang. Der facettierte grüne Zirkon und der klare Cubic Zirconia Stein setzen zusätzlich funkelnde Akzente.
Angenehmer Tragekomfort:
Die "Martha" Cuban Kette ist mit einer Länge von 41 cm bis 46 cm (verstellbar) angenehm zu tragen und dank der Materialien auch für empfindliche Haut geeignet.
Vielseitig kombinierbar:
Ob einzeln getragen oder im angesagten Lagenlook mit anderen Ketten – die "Martha" Cuban Kette ist ein wahres Multitalent und passt perfekt zu verschiedenen Stilrichtungen.
Hochwertige Materialien und langlebig:
Gefertigt aus kratzfestem Edelstahl mit robuster 2,5 Mikron PVD-Beschichtung in 18 Karat Gold, ist die "Martha" Cuban Kette nickelfrei, farbecht und wasserbeständig.
Versand & Rückgabe
- Lieferzeit beträgt 4-9 Werktage (inkl. 1-3 Werktage Bearbeitungszeit)
- 30 Tage Rückgaberecht ab Erhalt der Ware. Weitere Informationen findest Du in unseren Retourenbedingungen
Pflegehinweise
So pflegst du deinen neuen Schmuck, damit er lange glänzt!
Hey, damit du lange Freude an deinem neuen Schmuckstück hast, hab ich dir hier ein paar Pflegetipps zusammengestellt:
Aufbewahrung:
- Leg deinen Schmuck am besten immer in die stylischen Schmuckboxen, die du von uns dazu bekommen hast. So ist er sicher vor Kratzern und Staub geschützt.
- Schmuckstücke am besten einzeln aufbewahren, damit sie sich nicht gegenseitig zerkratzen können.
- Vermeide direkte Sonneneinstrahlung und hohe Temperaturen, sonst könnte dein Schmuckstück etwas ausbleichen.
Reinigung:
- Putze deinen Schmuck regelmäßig mit einem weichen Tuch.
- Bei stärkeren Verschmutzungen kannst du lauwarmes Wasser mit milder Seife verwenden.
- Finger weg von aggressiven Reinigungsmitteln, Scheuermitteln oder Chemikalien! Die mögen deine Schmuckstücke gar nicht.
- Nach dem Reinigen gut abtrocknen, damit keine Wasserflecken entstehen.
Tragen:
- Schminke, Parfum und Cremes am besten vor dem Anlegen deines Schmucks auftragen. So kann nichts daran kleben bleiben.
- Putzen mit Schmuck an den Händen lieber vermeiden, sonst könnte er zerkratzen.
- Nachts legst du deinen Schmuck am besten ab, damit er sich ausruhen kann.
Besondere Hinweise:
- Obwohl unsere Schmuckstücke aus hochwertigen Materialien gefertigt sind, können sie durch unsachgemäße Behandlung trotzdem beschädigt werden.
- Achte beim Tragen darauf, dass dein Schmuck keine anderen Gegenstände zerkratzt.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
OBSESSED!!!!!
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
I gave it 5 stars because it deserves the flowers. I do wish the paper was a little better quality. I think it would help make the pictures pop more. Regardless, this book is worth every penny. I haven't found anything else like it. The book is clear, concise, and isn't bogged down with too many details - just the facts m'am. It's a perfect starting reference to send someone down 101 different rabbit holes. I hope someday he puts out a hardback version on thick, slick paper with beautiful, glossy photographs. That would be lovely. For now, this will more than suffice. You get just enough about each artifact to get you going. From there, you can decide how to use your favorite search engine.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
★★★★★ 5
A great reference for Biblical factual archeology
Format: Paperback
I just received this book and I am so excited. It is a great tool and reference for Biblical studies. Each artifact has a great photograph next to the quick eye catching dates, discovery, period, keywords and Biblical passage. Then a brief but to the point description. It is simple and effective. Very easy to refer when reading your Bible or if you are just interested in archeology. Each artifact is about 2 pages and nothing more which is perfect for references. What a great book!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Excellent and in-depth archeologic finds that authenticate Bible history.
Format: Paperback
Archeology is proving much of the Bible's history as true. This book really delves into various sites and provides a lot of detail. My type of reading.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great information and pictures
Format: Paperback
Great information on Biblical sites, beautiful pictures, and a pretty book as well. I gave several of these to my family for Christmas. Everyone seemed to love them. The only thing I will caution you about is that the book is small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Knowledgeable and delectable book.
Format: Paperback
This book shows an excellent archaeological evidence of the Bible accuracy of places, names, events, etc. and proving for the Christians that the Bible is a historical document as well as the inspired inerrant word of God.
The majority of the book is interesting and delectable, I mean, the pages where the author presents archaeological facts such as the artifacts and their correlation with people, places times, events and practices recorded in the Bible. But I do not like when the author make personal assumptions and do not present any proof of that. He says: it probably be…. it may be… Here I show three cases of this conjectures;:
1.The author seems to affirm that the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem, or at least, the name of this event, was derived from the Roman triumph celebration. He says (page 231), regarding to the Roman Empire and the life of Jesus: “By the time of Jesus, the requirements and meaning of a triumphal entry had shifted slightly from its earlier roots associating it with a conquering hero, as it became even more significant and representative of kingship and divinity”. He continues to say: “In ancient Roman culture, a triumphant victor, known as vir triumphalis (“man of triumph”) would enter the city in a celebration parade wearing the laurel wreath and a purple garment, which identified him with the royal and the divine, while riding in a chariot pulled by four horses, alluding to Sol the sun god”.
But if we compare the Roman triumph celebration with the entry of Jesus into Jerusalem described in the Bible, it is not derived from the Roman culture but is the exact fulfillment of the prophesy of Zechariah 9:9. I do not see any correlation between the two celebration; Jesus did not ride a horse but a donkey to signify peace, meekness and humility. It was not a pompous entrance of a conquering hero or king wearing a expensive garment and royal crown.
2.Even though, it is not possible to identify the location of the tomb of Jesus with absolute certainty; the author states (page 199) that the tomb of Jesus is located at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre possible based on “the restoration work to the edicule and an arcosolium tomb from the Roman period found in the church of the Holy Sepulchre”. The author also affirms without giving any proof that: “Christians in Jerusalem then passed down a continuous memory of the location of the tomb (of Jesus) from the time of the burial and resurrection in AD33 until construction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was started in about AD326”. But where are the records of that time? The author probably based his statement on Eusebius who lived in the 3rd and 4th centuries AD.
According to the history , the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built by the Roman Emperor Constantine around 326 AD, when her mother the Queen Helena, wanted to replace the pagan temples with Christian churches; she met the Bishop Macarious of Jerusalem who determined the location where Jesus had been buried at the place where was a temple to the Greek goddess Venus. At the beginning of the construction of the church, a rock-cut tomb was found there and an edicule was built to protect the site. But later the edicule was destroyed and rebuild. More tombs has been found under this church. How to be sure or verify that this rock-cut tomb was the one where Jesus was buried?
3.The author is biased with respect to the Masoretic Text, he make a statement but does not support it with any evidence in this regard. Writing about the Dead Sea Scrolls (Page 173) he states: “And certain passages in the Masoretic text seem to have been intentionally modified to match ideas and theology of medieval Judaism.” it is a bad accusation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2021